Some possible reasons why demand is declining

Attending the AEMO’s feedback session on their planning documents yesterday, I was reminded that I had meant to follow-on my discussion about how demand is changing across the NEM with some of the possible reasons that we’ve either deduced for ourselves, or have had suggested** by a number of our clients.

** Suggestions made by clients and others have been included below, where possible.  Any mistakes in these explanations are entirely ours!

In no particular order, the following are some of the possible reasons.

1)  Factors contributing to demand growth levelling off, and maybe declining

It’s probable that most (if not all) of the following factors have been combining since 2006 to change the pattern of demand in the NEM (+ probably other factors we have not listed here, or thought of).

1a)  Demand might be being offset by…

i. Solar PV

The high level of support for small-scale solar PV installations across the country (through deemed multipliers on RECs in the SRES) and state-based feed-in tariff has reportedly seen an explosion in the installation of solar PV across the country.

It is our understanding that no-one really has a full picture of what is installed across the country:

1)  It was reported here in the Fairfax press that 1,100MW had been installed across the country;

2)  We heard yesterday that Energex has 300MW currently installed in their distribution area alone – amounting to “one in fifteen homes” as reported here.  I can recall hearing something like 500MW in Sydney, as well.

If anyone can point us at more detailed (and/or accurate) information, we’d be very curious to know?

ii.  Other embedded generation

At a larger scale, we’re also seeing some movement in terms of cogeneration and other embedded generation projects in the commercial and industrial space.  Some examples include:

1)  Origin (through their Cogent Energy subsidiary) and their commercial project at 101 Miller St in North Sydney, which they talk about here.

2)  Earlier this year, AGL announced (here) their partnership with Qenos in the installation of a sizeable cogeneration project at the Qenos site in Victoria – to follow on from other cogeneration projects at Coopers Brewery, Melbourne Water and elsewhere.

3)  Several years ago, Sucrogen upgraded its Pioneer sugar mill to become a sizeable cogeneration plant, and the other sugar mill operators are looking to complete similar projects.

1b)  Demand might be being reduced by…

i. Hang-over from the GFC

When the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) first hit, we did some preliminary analysis here.

Though the effect of the GFC was much lower, and less persistent, than in some other parts of the world, it has certainly had some effect.  It would not be possible to ascertain precisely how much.

ii. Two-speed economy

It has been commonly reported that Australia might be blessed (or cursed) with a two-speed economy.

If this is the case, and the majority of the benefits of the mining and commodities boom is being seen in Western Australia (not connected to the NEM) and Queensland (including some parts not connected to the NEM), it is probable that the results seen in terms of changing demand shapes would be attributable (at least in part) to this.

Of particular interest, in terms of electricity demand, is the reported “hollowing out of Australia’s manufacturing base” – and the disproportionate effect that might be seen in terms of electricity demand, as a result.

iii. Energy Efficiency Measures at Home

Driven by a combination of higher prices, raised environmental consciousness (through Earth Hour and other initiatives) and government initiatives, it’s commonly acknowledged that there has been progress towards greater energy efficiency in our homes.

A number of measures will have contributed to this, including:

1)  Higher efficiency lighting.  Some back-of-the-envelope calculations shows that this benefit, in terms of ongoing reduction in demand, might be substantial.

2)  Higher efficiency appliances, such as more efficient air-conditioning and and large-screen TVs – along with better standards for standby power.

3)  The much maligned federal ceiling insulation scheme would be contributing to reduced demand for electricity across much of the year.  A more difficult question would be to ascertain by how much.

4)  Additionally, we’ve started to see reports (such as in “McMansions losing their allure” on 22nd August in the AFR) that we might have collectively turned the corner in terms of demanding ever-increasing floor areas in new housing stock, with a decline in average floor area apparently seen since 2009.

iv. Energy Efficiency Measures at Work

Various State and Federal government initiatives (such as EEO and NGERS) would also be having some impact on the changing pattern of demand.

v. Price sensitivity of demand

I previously started a discussion about how rising prices for electricity were a major concern for large industrial energy users.  This is the type of analysis that is never really finished…

Undoubtedly the recent increases in prices will have had some effect of moderating consumption – both at work and at home.

Can you see other possible contributing factors?  If so please either:
1) Give us a call +61 (0)7 3368 4064 and let us know; or
2) Post them as comments below.

2)  Possible implications of this

We haven’t given this a whole load of thought, but it does appear to be very significant to the market and the electricity supply industry as a whole, for a number of reasons – including:

(a)  Numerous people have spoken about how the declining load factor in the NEM (and elsewhere around the world) makes for a more expensive electricity supply system (in capital terms) and also an accelerating average cost (per MWh).

(b)  This points to a greater need for measures such as Demand Side Response to mitigate these market-wide costs.

(c)  At a more fundamental level – there may be a paradigm shift under way, and one that might accelerate under a “smart-grid” enabled but carbon-constrained world.  If this is the case, then there will be a greater level of uncertainty about what might unfold in the future.  This means that previous “rules of thumb” might no longer hold true, and that there may be cost implications about this level of uncertainty.

(d)  Additionally, it also means that there are a greater range of stakeholders who have a significant impact on where demand will head for the future.

Key to considering possible implications is to understand whether this is a transient occurrence (such as if it is driven by a depressed economy in some sectors, or by retrofitting existing stock with insulation and changed light-bulbs etc…) or whether it is a more fundamental change (such as if driven by new technology).

When we have a bit more time, we’ll continue to ponder this situation – and will post some analysis of each of the factors, when we are able.

We’d welcome comments below – or on the phone +61 (0)7 3368 4064

Tags: ,
  • Bookmark and Share

    | More

45 responses to “Some possible reasons why demand is declining”

  1. Evan Jones says:

    Good morning

    Additional (albeit minor) reasons reducing electricity demand (apologies for the Queensland bias):
    – Increased Demand Side Management e.g. Energex’s Cool Change Trial – A 13 per cent reduction in peak energy demand was achieved on the hottest day of the 2009/2010 summer (
    – Household types and composition. Increasing densification of capital city populations is changing the historic relationship between population growth and electricity demand growth. IPART’s survey of residential energy demand illustrates the difference between house and unit electricity use by number of residents, as well as the impact of adults (>15 years old) versus children.
    – Industrial strucure and growth. Low growth in energy intensive industries (e.g. manufacturing) and high growth in service industries (typically low energy intensity) has reduced business electricity demand growth.
    – Resdiential high-draw devices. There has been sizeable growth in high-draw devices (primarily air conditioners) over the past 15 years, but the market is now close to saturation point in some categories (what is stopping the 20% of high-income households that don’t have an air conditioner from purchasing one?), which coupled with increased efficiency of high-draw devices, would be expected to reduce growth in electricity demand from these devices (closer to the growth in new dwellings).


    • Paul McArdle says:

      Hi Evan

      Thanks for the thoughts – and apologies for the delay in responding.

      I am curious to delve further into the detail, in order to understand the significance of these factors, and others people have noted. When time permits, I’ll be doing this with the database we’ve accumulated of sub-regional demand histories across the NEM – which should allow the benefit of (to some extent at least) looking at the effect in different sectors of the economy, and with respect to different weather patterns, etc….



  2. KEN says:

    Good day,

    If we are referring to forecast maximum seasonal demands, it could an overly optimistic forward projection influence mainly by outlandish economic forecast, the need for capx investment into aging network, influx of migrants, the weather, etc, etc.

    Notice that post GFC period, the economy did not shrink but grow at a slower pace, which means that the behaviour on energy utilisation has changed. This is inline with what Paul has mentioned on energy efficiency measures and retail price of electricity. However not forgetting that in recently 1-3 years, the weather is cooler not any warmer (especially in Queensland for where i am from).

    • Paul McArdle says:

      Thanks Ken

      Appreciate your points.

      The numbers I have looked at, to date, have been NEM-wide. To some extent this means that regional patterns (e.g. cooler summers in recent years in QLD) have their effects masked.



  3. Ben Skinner says:

    There is another rather prosiac reason for a weak energy demand in 2010/11: the natural disasters over the summer, most particularly the Brisbane River flood which supressed Qld demand for over a week. It would be possible to estimate this effect.

    On “embedded generation” a few points. Of course, what NEM commentators colloquially describe as “demand” is a misnomer, it is actually a measure of generation, and then only a subset of that-that which is easily measurable. And the “demand” excludes some generators, but includes losses in generating, transmitting and distributing electricity, which all change in turn with the pattern of dispatch!

    The easily measured generation is all “scheduled” and “semi-scheduled” generation. This is most generators with connection point capacity>30MW and some larger windfarms built prior to 2010. AEMO publishes the large non-scheduled wind generation separately, so that “demand” can be recovered, but as you correctly point out there are still many other non-scheduled generators for which AEMO has no data, such as PV’s and co-generators below 30MW.

    On the terminology, the rules define “embedded generation” as any distribution connected generation (which includes the 400MW Tallawarra!)-so I think what you mean is “non-scheduled”. We have lots of embedded scheduled generation, such as Tallawarra.

    On attempting to estimate the trend of demand for the future, the AEMO CEO presented on this matter at the ESOO launch:

    • Paul McArdle says:

      Thanks, Ben (once again) for contributing

      The ESI is full of commodities that are difficult to measure in actuality!

      As noted to Evan (above) I am keen to delve more into the history of zonal data we have in order to at least be able to identify the extent to which the trend observed on a NEM-wide basis (with the approximation of real demand) is similar across the 26 zones for which we have data NEM-wide.

      With so many data sets to analyse, it should be able to provide some insight into the extent to which various factors are at work – e.g. residential -vs- industrial -vs- commercial, north -vs- south, etc…

      In terms of estimating demand for the future, I would also like to have time to complete this type of retrospective on forecasts. Perhaps AEMO might include this in the data it releases in 2012?



  4. […] way NEM-wide demand growth has slowed, and may have started to decline (and the identification of possible reasons for this reversal) one of the first questions we’ve asked ourselves was the extent to which this […]

  5. […] * Note that this competition is all about where the peak demand will land (even if only for a single dispatch interval through the summer period) – average demand is another matter entirely, as discussed here. […]

  6. […] cause to ponder where the demand in the NEM has gone – including these contributing factors. And yes, as well, the NEM-wide demand stubbornly remains below 30,000MW. Tags: declining demand, […]

  7. […] been heavily influenced by La Nina, it’s understandable that demand was low – and certainly these other types of factors would also have all contributed, to varying […]

  8. […] over the past couple of years, which we’ve also previously analysed in a series of posts, such as this one, where we list a significant number of factors all contributing to the decline […]

  9. […] belated note – we proposed this longer list of contributory factors 18 months […]

  10. […] 1)  Most prominently, we see that production from black coal stations across QLD and NSW has fallen significantly from its high point in 2008 (by 15% over the 4 year period) after growing steadily in the 10 years prior.  This has been driven by a number of factors, including: 1a)  The flattening & decline of demand (a trend we’ve previously noted as  beginning around 2006, and which we surmised has been due to a number of factors such as these top 7 factors contributing to decline of demand. […]

  11. […] chart, demand has also been declining in the physical market for the past couple of years (with a number of contributing factors, including these).  As a first order variable, this means lower requirement for […]

  12. […] reference to the high demand in Victoria last week as noting it was a “new paradigm” because of the variety of factors putting downward pressure on electricity demand across all periods of the […]

  13. […] explore on WattClarity – such as the overall decline in peak demand, driven by La Nina and other factors in more recent […]

  14. […] years, to forecast what the peak demand will be – as they have to assess the extent to which a significant number of variables that have all been contributing to the changes in demand patterns summarised above: 1)  Some […]

  15. […] by our annual competition, and our ongoing analysis of how (and why) demand patterns are changing in the NEM, we have been pondering about the extent to which a change […]

  16. […] it more likely that any differences between weeks will be due to climatic factors and less due to these more systemic factors contributing to why demand patterns have been changing over the past 6 years or […]

  17. […] even the hot weather is not having the same effect as was have been the case 5 years ago – due to these factors suppressing demand, and increased surplus of capacity. Tags: high temperatures, peak regional demand, price spike, […]

  18. […] demand across the NEM in 2020 is the same as it was for 2012-13. We’ve discussed previously how demand in the NEM has been declining for a number of reasons – the outcome of which meaning that it’s a lot less certain, now, where demand will be at the […]

  19. […] As we’ve been noting for several years on WattClarity, demand continues to decline across the NEM for a number of reasons (including these reasons here). […]

  20. […] (in conjunction with other new technologies & changes in electricity usage practice – such as these listed here) in the Queensland network might reduce the typical increase in scheduled demand seen by the […]

  21. […] Demand growth began flattening around 2006, and has been declining in more recent times – for a number of reasons, summarised here. […]

  22. […] that needs to be met by the AEMO in dispatching Scheduled Generators in the market) is one of this list of contributing factors we posted a couple of years ago, and that are still relevant today, in terms of why demand growth […]

  23. […] assumptions We’ve been posting observations about the emergence of declining demand and its contributing factors for a number of years (here’s a general tag linking many of the […]

  24. […] ceilings, LED lighting, more efficient appliances, remembering to turn lights off, etc… – see our earlier list of possible reasons why demand is declining) Why has Ms Green been unable – or unwilling – to install Solar PV to […]

  25. […] As early as 2011 and perhaps earlier, we’ve been posting commentary about how growth in electricity demand was slowing, and then began to decline.  Across the NEM this trend does not appear to be slowing (and there are a number of reasons for this). […]

  26. […] Some years ago I compiled this list of factors contributing to the general pattern we’d observed of declining electricity de…. […]

  27. […] As is clear from this trend, it’s been 6 years since we have seen anything like this level of peak demand – which (as others have noted) should have been expected at some point (given ongoing population growth, etc) but is still noteworthy given the list of factors that had been working to suppress demand over the interim period. […]

  28. […] On WattClarity we have been posting insights about declining demand in the NEM for almost 10 years now.  Back in 2011, I posted this list of factors all contributing to the pattern of declining demand. […]

  29. […] of the earlier ones to start noting that demand was declining in the NEM (which we saw in 2011 was occurring for reasons such as these), I felt it important that I update my perspective – and share this here on WattClarity – lest […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *