A model’s just a model – it’s not reality (though some models might be useful)

Posted by Paul McArdle Saturday, July 23 2016 Topic: A collection of some core analytical challenges

I’ve noted this a number of times in the past (such as in this post about the the RET Review process back in 2014) and, given the current discussions underway in the NEM, feel that I’ll be referring to it a number of times in future.

Hence putting this short post up here to provide easy linking of these instances.

Tags:

SHARE ON LINKEDIN SHARE ON TWITTER SHARE ON FACEBOOK

About the Author

Paul McArdle
One of three founders of Global-Roam back in 2000, Paul has been CEO of the company since that time. As an author on WattClarity, Paul's focus has been to help make the electricity market more understandable.

Related Articles

10 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. A few thoughts on the RET Review process | WattClarity
  2. If I was going to assess Factors Contributing to the “truly remarkable” Q2 2016 prices, here are some starting places I’d look… | WattClarity
  3. What would price impacts be, if Hazelwood were to close in March 2017 as rumoured? | WattClarity
  4. Using a train analogy to explain Power Systems 101
  5. Introducing a train analogy to explain Power Systems 101
  6. Some initial musings about my own rooftop solar learning exercise - One Step Off The Grid | One Step Off The Grid
  7. It’s complete baloney to claim that there’s “less than 1%” of peak demand in the NEM that is currently providing Demand Response
  8. If I were going to perform an objective review of what happened last Thursday 18th and Friday 19th, here’s a couple things I would look into…
  9. An explainer about electricity demand [take 1]
  10. Beginner’s Guide to how dispatch works in the NEM, and hence how prices are set

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*